Weather

Vitebsk
Brest
Hrodna
Homiel
Mahilyow
Мinsk

Statistics

Articles View Hits
26958825

Recommend Print

Slander from the politician was unproven

Railway district court judge Vitebsk Elena Tsygankova stopped the administrative case against Alexander Kirillov. She has not seen the offense in Vitebsk political activist actions under Art. 9.2 (Defamation) of the Code of Administrative Offences.

Protocol of the police that September 30, 2013, Alexander Kirillov, while in "The Republican Hospital Speleotherapy" (Soligorsk) in the book of comments and suggestions pointed out that the medical staff at night playing cards with patients " to desire." However, these were the kind of desire, when, how, where and by whom these desires are met, in the book of comments and suggestions Kirillov was not specified.

In the course of the administrative process it became clear that the victims - that workers speleobolnitsy: E. Belego, L. Trubetskaya, T. Korotchenya and I. Galickaya. They argued that the information contained in the book Kirillov comments and suggestions, is patently false, shames them, and refers specifically to them, as at a specified time they were on duty.

Reveal themselves, girls put themselves in an awkward position in the eyes of colleagues and patients. After hours at work were not only them, but also other health care providers. But for some reason these four young hospital nurses found that he slandered.

Having evaluated all the evidence in the case, the judge Tsygankova concluded that Salihorsk police officers have been submitted convincing evidence of guilt Kirillov deliberate dissemination of false, defamatory fabrications. That is, there was no libel. After all the entries made in the book Kirillov comments and suggestions speleobolnitsy not contain any names or other data that could identify specific people. Therefore, neither of which defamation can be no question.

On this basis, to Alexander Kirillov administrative case was dismissed. However, the "victims" of nurses still have ten days to appeal the decision of the court of cassation.