Polotsk court dismissed the employee's claim for the return of his store of money withheld for the loss of the goods. The representative of the store said there was no shortage of withholdings from the employee was not made. Work also claimed that his salary withheld from 3 million rubles, but no receipts could not provide.

Director blames workers

In March Polotsk private convenience store "Alice", located near the train station, and conducted an audit revealed the shortage of goods by 57 million. Administration store blamed shortage of workers and shop workers demanded repay identified losses. Head shop wrote in his explanatory that the guards distracted cashiers from work, do not follow the buyers and engaged during their own affairs, so the goods are lost. Employees also believe cause poor job shortage commodity researchers who do not follow the shelf life: food spoiled and throw them out and hang on the job shortage.

Fight a lone hand

Workers who previously signed the treaty on collective liability, agreed to repay the shortfall deduction from wages. However, one of the workers, Dmitry, a security guard refused repayment shortfalls and wrote a letter of resignation. Dmitry - the only worker who has not signed an agreement on collective liability. However, when calculating the severance from it kept three million rubles.

Hope for the Court was not justified

Dmitry sued for unlawful detainer money. But in court employee failed to prove payroll deduction. As Dmitry said, the calculation gave him to sign a statement of receipt of full salary, and your hands were given only half a million.

Administration handed out to employees calculated as a scrap of paper on which printed computer way of calculating the salary figures, without stamps and signatures. As the judge said, "I have these leaflets can print as much as necessary." And representatives of the store said that no money from the employee they are not kept. It should be said that the store was not able to immediately submit financial documents, and the court gave him two days to bring the documents in order.

Prosecution after the trial

Shop workers, acted as witnesses gave contradictory testimony. Some employees testified in favor of the administration, part - against. Workers oppose the administration, after the trial began to show different claims. So, one of the cashiers accused of stealing money from the cash register, but could not prove it. Now bosses require that she left herself.

Partial victory

There is a positive side of the court. Administration store stopped forcing workers to process business hours. Previously have been working for 14 hours, and they recorded 12 working hours. Now the administration has allowed work two hours per shift to leave the workplace for a meal.

Alexander Morozov, dyjalog.info